Others, such as Liberal Democrat MP and campaign supporter Sandra Gidley, say the government should have acted sooner.Other Liberal Democrats take a more sensible view. The Whiskey Priest, for instance.
"It's absolutely the right decision. The scandal is it's taken so long to come to this decision.
"You cannot look at this sort of material and not be affected."
Liberal Democrat Blog of the Year 2014
"Well written, funny and wistful" - Paul Linford; "He is indeed the Lib Dem blogfather" - Stephen Tall
"Jonathan Calder holds his end up well in the competitive world of the blogosphere" - New Statesman
"A prominent Liberal Democrat blogger" - BBC Radio 4 Today; "One of my favourite blogs" - Stumbling
and Mumbling; "Charming and younger than I expected" - Wartime Housewife
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Banning violent pornography
I was all ready to write something about New Labour having found another thing to ban. But read further down this BBC report and what do you find?
Jonathan - whilst not a friend as such, I did know Jane Longhurst and was appalled at the tragedy that befell her.
ReplyDeleteThis is a complex issue. I accept that banning is a blunt instrument, but at the same time there is evidence that excessive exposure to shocking imagery desensitises people, and when what was once shocking becomes commonplace there is perhaps a greater risk for persons of a certain propensity to indulge ion acts that might have never been given a focus.
So I think Sandra and Gavin are both right, and both wrong.
But Tabman - the same could be said of any intoxicant - eg, the link between excessive consumption of alcohol and public displays of violence (and far more widespread domestic violence).
ReplyDeleteWe are all responsible for our individual actions - alcohol or pornography can never be an excuse for violence.
And if we're looking for root causes isn't it more instructive to look at what motivated that individual in the first place to get their kicks from violent pornography?
Peter, Stephen, what are your concerns here- the principle of banning violent pornography, or the mechanics of the law - or both?
ReplyDeleteThere is currently a petition to the PM being gathered at
ReplyDeletehttp://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Violent-Porn/
Please support the fight against "thought crime"!
Teddy
There is no evidence that shows exposure to pornography or violent pornography causes behavioural change.
ReplyDeleteIf you are not pre-disposed to commit violent acts then viewing such acts will not cause you to commit them.
Not even the evidence put forward by anti-pornography campiagners claims it causes a behavioural change.
Adults know very well the difference between fantasy and reality. Fantasising about violence is quite common, even sexual violence. This does not mean those ordinary decent people who indulge in such fantasies will, or even want to, carry them out in real-life.
Think of the horrendous ordeal of a sex-offenders trial... are we going to put people and their families through that for commiting a 'crime' for which there is no evience of harm?
That would be piling tradegy on top of tragedy.