Martin Hammond, who was Boris Johnson's housemaster at Eton, famously summed up his 17-year-old pupil:
"Boris really has adopted a disgracefully cavalier attitude to his classical studies. [He] sometimes seems affronted when criticised for what amounts to a gross failure of responsibility (and surprised at the same time that he was not appointed Captain of the school for the next half).
"I think he honestly believes that it is churlish of us not to regard him as an exception, one who should be free of the network of obligation that binds everyone else."
On Sunday the historian and public school headmaster Anthony Seldon summoned him to his study.
Seldon was interviewed on Johnson by Tim Adams, who wrote:
Seldon is a man who has devoted his life to understanding and nurturing the kind of emotional intelligence and civic responsibility from which society can be woven. Johnson represents the wilful rupture of those beliefs.
Talking about him, Seldon acknowledges the former prime minister’s charisma "lights up the room", but you sense too his almost personal feeling of betrayal at the squandering of those gifts, that headmasterly reaction that Johnson had let down his school, his family, his nation, but most of all, himself.
And here is Seldon's view in his own words:
“"The great prime ministers are all there at moments of great historical importance,but they have to respond to them well. Chamberlain didn’t; Churchill in 1940, did. Asquith didn’t; Lloyd George did in 1916.
Moving on from school, I'm currently reading Simon Kuper's Chums: How a Tiny Caste of Oxford Tories Over the UK."Johnson had Brexit, he had the pandemic, he had the invasion of Ukraine and incipient third world war. He could have been the prime minister he craved to be, but he wasn’t, because of his utter inability to learn."
I'd be interested to know what Hammond told Balliol about Johnson when he applied. I can't imagine any state school pupil would have got in with a report like that.
ReplyDeleteI fear your excellent article is spoiled by your final comment. The Oxford Union may produce its fair share of plausible rogues, but the University itself is rather more than that, as witness, for example, their world-leading scientists' work during the pandemic.
ReplyDeleteDo I hear the sound of Oxford ranks closing? :-)
ReplyDeleteOf course, you are right about science at Oxford, but even beyond the awfulness of the Tory Union set, Chums does not make me with I had taken my Philosophy degree there.