Katharine Pindar argues that the Liberal Democrats have nothing to lose by being bold.
Joanna Moncrief is interviewed about her research review that threw doubt on the idea that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance in the brain.
"The blast on October 14 1913 killed 439 men and boys, with another dying during rescue operations. It was, and remains, the worst coal mining disaster in British history and also the sixth worst in the world." Ben Curtis on the Senghenydd colliery explosion.
"Whitfield would always have to put up with 'difficult' male performers (she had grown used to having to get through scenes stroking Frankie Howerd's hair without horrifying him by dislodging his wig, and she had to spend all of The Blood Donor episode - and all of the subsequent others - trying to interact with Tony Hancock whilst he stared blankly over her shoulder reading his cue cards)." Graham McCann says that. because she was a woman, June Whitfield never received the respect she deserved as a performer.
A London Inheritance mourns the death of the city's telephone boxes.
WRT Katharine Pindar's piece, you can have a basic checklist when assessing policy, mine would be:
ReplyDelete* Is the policy any good?
* Is the policy consistent with Liberal principles + philosophy?
* Is the policy easily understood?
* Is the policy differentiated away from other parties?
* Is the policy being communicated by the leadership?
* Is the policy popular with the public?
There are so many areas we could discuss but Katharine mentions Guaranteed Basic Income. This is a radical departure for the Welfare State but is not understood outside of Lib Dem activist circles. Compare and contrast with our social policies in the For a Fair Deal document - we'd stop the sanctions on Universal Credit and increase it incrementally enough to raise people out of poverty.
So what do you emphasise - a radical transformative policy that takes us to unchartered waters, or the policy which deals with the status quo and is very straightforward - i.e. turn on the money tap via a pre existing benefit system? I'm sure this is a debate as old as the hills, and will run and run