But never forget the first law of politics. When people of good will in all parties are united behind a measure it almost always proves disastrous.
So, for a dissident voice, turn to Dr Michael Fitzpatrick on the Spiked website:
The new approach to health and illness marks a dramatic break with tradition - but not a progressive one. In the recent past, health was regarded as the normal state of affairs and illness was considered an exceptional departure from normality, a transient state through which the patient passed - with the blessing of medical authority (even if no great benefit accrued from medical intervention ) - before returning to good health and a familiar level of social functioning.
Now health has become a state that can only be attained through a high level of personal awareness and commitment to a prescribed lifestyle, through intense vigilance against health risks and through a willingness to submit to regular professional intervention in the cause of preventing disease (or at least of detecting it at an early stage).
1 comment:
That does make one pause and wonder whether this is a good idea.
How long until the government starts prescribing particular lifestyles, backed up with tax breaks or threats (or worse)?
Certainly something I can see this government doing...
Going to the doctor for a general checkup to catch anything before it gets serious is simply good practice, but prescribed lifestyles are getting dangerously illiberal.
Post a Comment