Thursday, May 27, 2004

And more on Leicester South

A report from The Scotsman bigging up Liberal Democrat prospects.

More from Shropshire

One of the great headlines of our time: Controversial duck pond wins approval.

"A great parliamentarian and a close personal friend"

So it was not to be Birmingham Hodge Hill or Reading East. Jim Marshall, the Labour MP for Leicester South, died unexpectedly today. There is a report with tributes here.

Meanwhile, David Boothroyd has posted last year's local election results in the constituency to the uk.politics.electoral news group:

"South consists of the whole of Aylestone, Eyres Monsell, Freemen, Knighton, Spinney Hills and Stoneygate, most of Castle and part of Latimer wards.

Including Castle but excluding Latimer the vote totals were:

L Dem 10,838 42.2
Lab 6,996 27.2
C 5,205 20.2
GP 1,925 7.5
BNP 462 1.8
Ind 278 1.1"

Tuesday, May 25, 2004

News from Shropshire

Regular readers will know that this blog often relies on the Shropshire Star for its news. This can have its advantages as recent reports give unique insights into the flour bomb attack on the prime minister and Lembit Opik's engagement.

Saturday, May 22, 2004

Lord Bonkers' Diary

I have updated his lordship's website. It now includes his latest diary from Liberator magazine and my May House Points columns from Liberal Democrat News.

Monday, May 17, 2004

More by-election rumours

It is not just Birmingham Hodge Hill, reports the Guardian, it is Reading East too.

Mistaken identity

A public meeting on the government’s proposed national identity card will be held on Wednesday afternoon at the London School of Economics. Full details here or here.

More doubts

It seems that the 14-year-old was advised by a 21-year-old who has been variously described as a "counsellor" or an "outreach worker". I often moan about professionals, but a 21-year-old cannot possibly have the level of education or supervised practice to be called a professional.

It is never a good idea to make too much of one case reported in the newspapers. And there are hard questions here. Why didn't the daughter feel able to confide in her mother? Was the mother right to go to the newspapers?

Yet it worries me that most liberals and left-wingers will unhesitatingly side with the authorities here. Think of their attitude towards Victoria Gillick, who tried to uphold parental rights a few years ago. They did not just disagree with her - which is a perfectly defensible position - they ridiculed her.

But if we have such a low opinion of the average citizen that we doubt her ability to give sensible advice to her own daughter, where does that leave liberalism or even democracy?

Meanwhile, here are two good article from the Telegraph. (You will need to register, but it is worth it if only for the obituaries.) The first disagrees with everything I have just said rather convincingly, and the second shows how the authorities have been passing the buck:

"The next call was to Irene Kakoullis, the teenage pregnancy strategy manager for Nottingham city council. But a woman answering the telephone said we had to speak to a marketing and brand development company, Diva Creative, in Sheffield."

Iraq Body Count

An important resource.

The site currently estimates the number of civilian deaths in Iraq since the start of the invasion at somewhere between 9,148 and 11,005.

Sunday, May 16, 2004

Security news

Thameslink train services were at the centre of a major terrorist alert this week.

A driver spotted a passenger about to fire what he thought was a deadly grenade launcher.

In fact, he was playing a Rolf Harris-style didgeridoo.

Read on.

Thursday, May 13, 2004

Important political analysis

In these difficult times, this website is a great comfort.

"Welcome to the 'George W. Bush or Chimpanzee' webpage. This is a little project I decided to start once I realized how much George W. Bush looks like a chimpanzee. I'm not a member of any political party, and I have nothing in particular against the man. I just think he kind of looks like a chimpanzee" - Bill Feldspar.

Doubts

Perhaps it comes from reading the Daily Mail the other day, but I find myself disturbed by this report.

"A woman whose 14-year-old daughter had an abortion on the advice of a school health worker but without her knowledge launched a furious attack on the system after being left out of the decision-making process."

What disturbs me is the thoroughly modern assumption behind this that parents cannot be trusted to have their children's best interests at heart, but that professionals - any professionals - are always right.

We are told that:

"A spokesman for the school said that they had issued a letter to all parents in September to make them aware that community child health workers could be speaking to children."

Do you know what a "community child health worker" is? What training he or she will have? How you become one? What research there is to show whether or not they do a good job?

Me neither. But they must know best because they are professionals. Mustn't they?

By-election rumour

Courtesy of Anthony Wells' elegant blog:

"Rumours are afoot that Terry Davis, the MP for Birmingham Hodge Hill, will next month be elected Secretary General of the Council of Europe, causing a by-election."

Read the full story here. And the result last time in Hodge Hill here.

Monday, May 10, 2004

Melanie Phillips and torture

When you write a letter complaining about a reference to you in a newspaper you never admit to having bought a copy. You always it has been "drawn to my attention".

Similarly, no Liberal Democrat ever admits to having bought the Daily Mail. You always say you picked up a discarded copy on the train.

So it was that I read Melanie Phillips' column in the Mail this morning. (The newspaper does not have much of a site itself, but she has a comprehensive one of her own.)

Melanie Phillips is a hate figure for many on the left, but I rather admire her. I like her rather Victorian sensibility (and that is a compliment in my book) and her willingness to talk about heavy moral concepts.

As David Goodhart is quoted as saying in this Guardian profile:

"'I do admire her.' In her work, he sees 'debates we should be having' about the social and cultural loosenings since the 60s, about 'the bad side-effects of the freedom we want'."

But her effort this morning was dreadful.

Torture is not a good subject for a columnist. You can do more than say it is wrong. Or, in Phillips' words: "Torture is always wrong, and corrupts those who employ it."

Trouble is, editors expect you to write to length, so you have to say more than that. Which is why Phillips found herself writing: "Torture is always wrong, and corrupts those who employ it. But..."

The "But" turned out to be: "But the moral squeamishness of the west is also the hole in its defences. The digital camera on the belt of the western soldier is a devastating weapon against his own side."

So opposition to torture is moral squeamishness and a hole in our defences? I prefer to think of it as what distinguishes a civilised country from someone like Saddam Hussein.

On Phillips' analysis the problem at Abu Ghraib is not the dogs or the nakedness or the beatings. It is the digital cameras.

Saturday, May 08, 2004

A sign of the times

Three Albanian men found in the back of a lorry in Dover have been arrested on suspicion of trying to smuggle themselves out of the UK.

Thanks again, BBC.