Saturday, September 05, 2009

Lenny Harper defends his conduct of Jersey investigation

Lenny Harper, the police office in charge of the investigation into alleged abuse at the Haut de la Garenne children's home on Jersey, has written a long post on Stuart Syvret's blog defending his conduct of the investigating and exposing the pressure put on him by the island's government:

It was during this process that builders who had worked on the site told us that a few years before they had found bones they were convinced were human but had been told to ‘forget them’ and “let bygones be bygones.” (This phrase became a catchword among my team whenever the subject of attempts at cover up would arise.) One worker was so convinced they were human he took them home to examine them against computer images which only strengthened his fears.

Eventually these bones were examined by a Jersey Pathologist after police had called her to the home. She told the officer “I don’t like the look of this,” but was later to say she could not remember making that comment. She was “not saying it wasn’t made, but just couldn’t remember it.” She took the bones to her boss whose extremely short (five lines) report said the bones were too large to be human but also stated that one of the bones “could not identified.” He gave the measurements of the bones and our anthropologist took issue with his findings saying that the size of the bone concerned was within the size range of a child.

Unfortunately the bones were destroyed by the pathologist without being examined by an anthropologist. Our advice was that they should have been so examined as the pathologist was not qualified to rule on whether or not they were human. The builders told us that they had found two child’s shoes with the bones. The pathologist told us that he had sent them for examination and had been told they were Victorian. The person he said he sent them to remembered no such incident.

Unfortunately the shoes too had been destroyed and were unavailable to us.

1 comment:

Frank Little said...

I can't help feeling that Robert Banks Stewart (who was not afraid of controversy) would have written a great "Bergerac" episode if he had been aware of these findings. Or perhaps he did, and it was suppressed by the BBC?