So here's one tweet Bradley has not deleted:
Bradley is talking nonsense because this measure of poverty is based upon median income not mean income, and he appears not to understand the difference.Except 1 in 3 kids don't live in poverty, thats an absolute fallacy. Labour's measure of 'relative' poverty is meaningless. If Richard Branson gets richer, more kids get 'relatively' impoverished. Its just an arbitrary line on income, ignoring things like local cost of living etc https://t.co/UpOyDBgtdJ
— Ben Bradley MP (@BBradley_Mans) October 22, 2020
This is absolutely right.
— Jonathan Portes (@jdportes) October 19, 2020
Probability/statistics is *by far* the most important branch of maths - both for everyday life and to be an informed citizen. Hopelessly underemphasised in curriculum. https://t.co/DjTdTvxDWP
7 comments:
Bradley has a degree in Politics, apparently achievable without any knowledge of statistics.
Having dropped out twice before getting that one the mode of his university achievement is to leave without taking a degree.
In my more cynical moments I think that maybe the country would benefit from banning anyone with a Politics or PPE degree from elected office.
I do think some understanding of basic statistics is essential to enable people in elected office who have to make decisions involving evaluating numbers. Especially that point about the difference between mean and median.
Bradley's degree (according to Wiki) was a 1st from Nottingham Trent - wonder how really difficult that is....
He was lucky to get a first, imagine his difficulty understanding any higher number?
Perhaps some mandatory basic training and refreshers for all elected MPs. We could call it Continuous Professional Development (and extend it to at least upper-tier councillors)
Refresher for MPs? Forty years ago(we were soldiers once and young...), I was a young economic counsellor at the Québec National Assembly in Canada and was tasked to give such refresher to newly elected MNAs. I had barely begun nwhen the most senior of the group (Oxford and Harvard MBA), rose up , exclaimed: "A deficit is a deficit isn'tit ?" and left the room.Then the member from the poorest riding (a small time housebuilder) said :"I am a businessman and I know economic", left followed by the others. Even the whip was not powerful enough to make them learn anything.
A typical Irish education up to school leaving age includes probability & statitistics in additional to arithmetic, trig, algebra, etc.
And I don't believe we are some exceptional outlier.
Why would one have to choose between these basic topics?
Whilst I find it difficult to believe that you have never referred back to any arithmetic, trig, algebra subsequently that is slightly aside from the point. I haven't been required to understand formation of ox-bow lakes, to know about the diurnal activities of medieval monks but I don't regret learning these things...
Anonymous: I have certainly used lots of arithmetic, but I was sharp at that before I got to secondary school.
Post a Comment